Anterior vaginal repair for urinary incontinence in women

Abdominal retropubic suspension appears to be better than anterior vaginal repair for subjective cure in urinary incontinence in women.

A Cochrane review included 10 studies with a total of 385 women having an anterior vaginal repair and 627 women who received comparison interventions. medium term (failure rate within 1 to 5 years 38% vs 172.29, 95% CI 1.7 to 3.08; 8 trials, n=586) and long-term (38% vs 21%, RR 2.02, 95% CI 1.36 to 3.01; n=273). A small trial (n=16) provided insufficient evidence of anterior repair compared with physical therapy. Two trials did not find any clinically important differences between anterior repair and needle suspension (RR for cure 1.08, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.47)."?>A single small trial provided insufficient evidence to assess anterior vaginal repair in comparison with physical therapy. The performance of anterior repair in comparison with bladder neck needle suspension appeared similar (risk ratio (RR) for failure after one year 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 1.56), but clinically important differences could not be confidently ruled out. No trials compared anterior repair with suburethral sling operations or laparoscopic colposuspensions, or compared alternative vaginal operations.

Anterior vaginal repair was less effective than open abdominal retropubic suspension based on patient-reported cure rates in eight trials both in the medium term (failure rate within one to five years after anterior repair 97/259 (38%) versus 57/327 (17%); RR 2.29, 95% confidence Interval (CI) 1.70 to 3.08) and in the long term (after five years, (49/128 (38%) versus 31/145 (21%); RR 2.02, 95% CI 1.36 to 3.01). There was evidence from three of these trials that this was reflected in a need for more repeat operations for incontinence (25/107 (23%) versus 4/164 (2%); RR 8.87, 95% CI 3.28 to 23.94). These findings held, irrespective of the co-existence of prolapse (pelvic relaxation). Although fewer women had a prolapse after anterior repair (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.47), later prolapse operation appeared to be equally common after vaginal (3%) or abdominal (4%) operation.

In respect of the type of open abdominal retropubic suspension, most data related to comparisons of anterior vaginal repair with Burch colposuspension. The few data describing comparison of anterior repair with the Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz procedure were consistent with those for Burch colposuspension.

Comment: The quality of evidence is downgraded by indirectness of evidence (the control intervention is infrequently used at present).

Ədəbiyyat

1. [Assessed as up-to-date: 6 September 2009]Glazener CM, Cooper K, Mashayekhi A. Anterior vaginal repair for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;(7):CD001755. .