Əsas səhifə

Çap

Əks əlaqə

İnfo
Continuous vs intermittent proton pump inhibitors for gastroesophageal reflux disease

Mündəricat

Continuous vs intermittent proton pump inhibitors for gastroesophageal reflux disease

Sübutlu məlumatların xülasələri
27.06.2018 • Sonuncu dəyişiklik 27.06.2018
Editors

On-demand or intermittent proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy may be as effective as continuous therapy at least in endoscopy-negative reflux disease and non-severe erosive esophagitis.

A systematic review including 16 studies with a total of at least 13374 subjects was abstracted in DARE. Most studies assessed discontinuation rates of proton pump inhibitors. One RCT (100 patients with grade A or B endoscopically diagnosed erosive esophagitis (EE) entered; 66 patients whose symptoms resolved with initial treatment took on-demand treatment) reported similar levels of symptom control at 4 to 8 weeks between patients taking on-demand esomeprazole 40 mg or omeprazole 20 mg and those taking continual daily dosing. On-demand treatment with omeprazole 20 mg was superior to continuous treatment in controlling GERD symptoms. One RCT (1,471 patients with GERD) reported similar levels of patient satisfaction for on-demand esomeprazole 20 mg and intermittent esomeprazole 40 mg daily for 2 to 4 weeks. One RCT (704 patients with EE or endoscopy-negative reflux disease) reported that one year of intermittent treatment (2- to 4-week courses) was successfully completed in 48% allocated to omeprazole 20 mg, 46% allocated to omeprazole 10 mg and 47% allocated to ranitidine. Patients experienced between 273 and 279 days in 12 months off treatment with PPI or H2-receptor antagonist.

Comment: The quality of evidece is downgraded by several limitations in review methodology.

Ədəbiyyat

  1. Lee TJ, Fennerty MB, Howden CW. Systematic review: is there excessive use of proton pump inhibitors in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease? Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2004;20:1241-1251.