Əsas səhifə

Çap

Əks əlaqə

İnfo
Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second degree tears

Mündəricat

Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second degree tears

Sübutlu məlumatların xülasələri
14.07.2017 • Sonuncu dəyişiklik 14.07.2017
Editors

Continuous suturing techniques for perineal closure after childbirth, compared to interrupted methods, are associated with less short-term pain.

A Cochrane review included 16 studies with a total of 8 184 women. Continuous suture techniques compared with interrupted sutures for perineal closure (all layers or perineal skin only) are associated with less pain for up to 10 days postpartum (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.88; 9 trials, n=3 619). There was an overall reduction in analgesia use associated with the continuous subcutaneous technique versus interrupted stitches for repair of perineal skin (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.84; 6 trials, n=2 971). Subgroup analysis showed some evidence of reduction in dyspareunia experienced by participants in the groups that had continuous suturing for all layers (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.98). There was also a reduction in suture removal in the continuous suturing groups versus interrupted (RR 0.56; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.98; 6 trials, n=3 453), but no significant differences were seen in the need for re-suturing of wounds or long-term pain.

Ədəbiyyat

  1. Kettle C, Hills RK, Ismail KM. Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second degree tears. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD000947 [Review content assessed as up-to-date: 14 November 2012].