Əsas səhifə

Çap

Əks əlaqə

İnfo
Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse

Mündəricat

Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse

Sübutlu məlumatların xülasələri
26.03.2018 • Sonuncu dəyişiklik 26.03.2018
Editors

Sacral colpopexy may have lower risk of awareness of prolapse, recurrent prolapse on examination, repeat surgery for prolapse, and postoperative stress urinary incontinence compared with vaginal procedures in women with apical vaginal prolapse.

Comment: The quality of evidence is downgraded by study limitations (unclear allocation concealment and blinding of outcome assessment in half ot the studies) and by imprecise results (wide confidence intervals and few outcome events).

Summary

A Cochrane review included 30 studies with a total of 3414 subjects. Vaginal procedures versus sacral colpopexy: After vaginal procedures, awareness of prolapse, recurrent prolapse, repeat surgery for prolapse, and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) were more common (table ). There was no conclusive evidence that vaginal procedures increased bladder injury or repeat surgery for SUI (table). Vaginal surgery with mesh versus without mesh: There was no clear difference in awareness of prolapse, recurrent prolapse, or repeat surgery for prolapse (table ). The confidence interval were very wide. There is probably little or no difference between the groups in rates of SUI (de novo) or dyspareunia (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.66; 5 RCTs, n = 501; moderate-quality evidence).

Vaginal procedure versus sacral colpopexy for the repair of apical prolapse
OutcomeRelative effect (95% CI) Assumed risk - Control - Sacral colpopexy Corresponding risk - Intervention - Vaginal surgery (95% CI)No of Participants (studies) Quality of evidence
Awareness of prolapse (2 years)RR 2.11 (1.06 to 4.21) 65 / 1000 137 / 1000 (69 to 274) 277 (3) Moderate
Repeat surgery for prolapse (2 to 4 years)RR 2.28 (1.20 to 4.32) 41 / 1000 93 / 1000 (49 to 177) 383 (4) Moderate
Recurrent prolapse on examination (1 to 2 years)RR 1.89 (1.33 to 2.70) 232 / 1000 438 / 1000 (309 to 626)390 (4) Moderate
Repeat surgery for SUI (2 years) RR 1.87 (0.72 to 4.86) 32 / 1000 61 / 1000 (23 to 157)395 (4) Moderate
Bladder injuryRR 0.57 (0.14 to 2.36) 16 / 1000 9 / 1000 (2 to 39) 511 (5) Moderate
Stress urinary incontinence (2 years) RR 1.86 (1.17 to 2.94)139 / 1000 259 / 1000 (163 to 409) 263 (3) Moderate
Vaginal mesh compared with no vaginal mesh for women with apical vaginal prolapse
OutcomeRelative effect (95% CI)Assumed risk - Control - Vaginal colpopexy Corresponding risk - Intervention - Vaginal meshNo of Participants (studies) Quality of evidence
Awareness of prolapse (3 years) 1.08 (0.35 to 3.30)179 / 1000 193 / 1000 (63 to 589) 54 (1) Low
Repeat surgery for prolapse (1 to 3 years) 0.69 (0.3 to 1.60) 42 / 1000 29 / 1000 (13 to 67) 497 (5) Low
Recurrent prolapse on examination (1-3 years) 0.36 (0.09 to 1.40) 615 / 1000 222 / 1000 (55 to 862)269 (3) Low
Repeat surgery for SUI (2 years) 4.91 (0.86 to 27.94)19 / 1000 94 / 1000 (17 to 536)220 (2) Low
Bladder injury 3.00 (0.91 to 9.89) 13 / 1000 38 / 1000 (11 to 124)445 (4) Very low
SUI (de novo 1 to 3 years) 1.37 (0.94 to 1.99)219 / 1000 300 / 1000 (206 to 436)295 (4) Moderate

Clinical comments

Note

Date of latest search: 6 July 2015

Ədəbiyyat

  1. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K et al. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;(10):CD012376.