Əsas səhifə

Çap

Əks əlaqə

İnfo
Psychosocial interventions for recurrent abdominal pain in childhood

Mündəricat

Psychosocial interventions for recurrent abdominal pain in childhood

Sübutlu məlumatların xülasələri
26.03.2018 • Sonuncu dəyişiklik 26.03.2018
Editors

Cognitive behavioural therapy and hypnotherapy may have some effect in reducing pain in the short term in children and adolescents with recurrent abdominal pain compared to usual care or wait-list control.

Comment: The quality of evidence is downgraded by study limitations (lack of blinding of personnel and outcome assessment) and by imprecise results (small studies and few patients).

Summary

A Cochrane review included 18 studies with a total of 928 children and adolescents between the ages of 6 and 18 years. No organic cause for this pain can be found on physical examination or investigation for the majority of such children. Treatment success occurred more often with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) compared to control after the intervention, but there was no evidence of treatment success at medium-term follow-up (table ). There was no evidence of effects of intervention on pain intensity scores measured postintervention or at medium-term follow-up (table ). There was no difference in quality of life or functional disability between the groups.

For hypnotherapy (including studies of guided imagery) compared to control, there was evidence of greater treatment success postintervention as well as reductions in pain intensity and pain frequency (table ). For yoga therapy compared to control, there was no evidence of effectiveness on pain intensity reduction postintervention (SMD -0.31, 95% CI -0.67 to 0.05; Z = 1.69; P = 0.09; 3 studies; n=122; low-quality evidence).

Cognitive behavioural therapy compared with usual care or wait-list control for children and adolescents with recurrent abdominal pain
OutcomeOR (95% CI)Probable outcome with control or usual care Probable outcome with CBT Number of participants (studies) Quality of evidence
Treatment success: postinterventionPooled OR 5.67 (1.18 to 27.32) 211 / 1000 494 / 1000 175 (4) Very low
Treatment success: medium-term follow-up (between 3 and 12 months) Pooled OR 3.08 (0.93 to 10.16) 349 / 1000 551 / 1000 139 (3) Low
Pain intensity: postintervention Lower score equals less pain. The pain score in the CBT groups was, on average, 0.33 SDs lower (95% CI -0.74 to 0.08) than in the control groups405 (7) Low
Pain intensity: medium-term follow-up (between 3 and 12 months) Lower score equals less pain. The pain score in the CBT groups was, on average, 0.32 SDs lower (95% CI -0.85 to 0.20) than in the control groups 301 (4) Low
Hypnotherapy compared with usual care or wait-list control for children and adolescents with recurrent abdominal pain
Outcomes OR (95% CI) Probable outcome with control or usual careProbable outcome with hypnotherapy Number of participants (studies) Quality of evidence
Treatment success: postintervention Pooled OR 6.78 (2.41 to 19.07) 136 / 1000 525 / 1000146 (4) Low
Pain intensity: postintervention Lower score equals less pain. The pain intensity score in the hypnotherapy groups was, on average, 1.01 SDs lower (95% CI -1.41 to -0.61) than in the control groups. 146 (4) Low
Pain frequency: postintervention Lower score equals less pain. The pain frequency score in the hypnotherapy groups was, on average, 1.28 SDs lower (95% CI -1.84 to -0.72) than in the control groups.146 (4) Low

Clinical comments

Note

Date of latest search: 9 june 2016

Ədəbiyyat

  1. Abbott RA, Martin AE, Newlove-Delgado TV et al. Psychosocial interventions for recurrent abdominal pain in childhood. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;(1):CD010971.