The quality of evidence is downgraded by study limitations (lack of blinding of outcome assessment).
A Cochrane review included 8 RCTs to evaluate the benefits in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and harms (toxicity) of VEGF-targeting therapies in patients with hormone-refractory or hormone-receptor negative metastatic breast cancer. Five trials evaluated chemotherapy with and without bevacizumab in first-line therapy and 3 trials in second-line therapy (Table 1).
| Outcome | Number of participants (studies) | Relative effect (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab in first-line therapy | ||
| Progression-free survival (PFS) | 2 886 (5) | HR 0.67 (0.61 – 0.73) |
| Overall survival (OS) | 2 695 (4) | HR 0.93 (0.84 – 1.04) |
| Response rate | 2 285 (5) | OR 1.96 (1.64 – 2.34) |
| Bevacizumab in second-line therapy | ||
| Progression-free survival (PFS) | 1 146 (2) | HR 0.85 (0.73 – 0.98) |
| Overall survival (OS) | 1 146 (2) | HR 0.98 (0.83 – 1.16) |
| Response rate | 1 058 (3) | OR 1.87 (1.37 – 2.54) |
The rate of patients who permanently discontinued treatment was significantly higher in the bevacizumab group (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.66). The overall risk to develop either a serious adverse event (SAE) (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.75) or an adverse event of grade III or higher (OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.44 to 2.18) was higher in those patients treated with bevacizumab.
Date of latest search: