Əsas səhifə

Çap

Əks əlaqə

İnfo
Surgery versus thrombolysis for initial management of acute limb ischaemia

Mündəricat

Surgery versus thrombolysis for initial management of acute limb ischaemia

Sübutlu məlumatların xülasələri
04.08.2017 • Sonuncu dəyişiklik 04.08.2017
Editors

There appears not to be difference in limb salvage or death at one year between initial surgery and initial thrombolysis for the management of acute limb ischaemia, but there is a higher incidence of major complications with thrombolysis, including stroke and major haemorrhage. The higher risk of complications must be balanced against individual risks in surgery.

A Cochrane review included 5 studies with a total of 1 283 subjects. There was no significant difference in limb salvage or death at 30 days, six months or one year between initial surgery and initial thrombolysis (at 1 year for limb salvage OR 0.88 favours surgery, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.23, 2 studies, n=654; for death OR 0.87 favours thrombolysis, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.25, 3 studies, n=768). Stroke was significantly more frequent at 30 days in thrombolysis participants compared to surgery participants (1.3% vs. 0%; OR 6.41, 95% CI 1.57 to 26.22; 5 studies, n=1 180). Major haemorrhage was more likely at 30 days in thrombolysis participants compared to surgery participants (8.8% vs. 3.3%; OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.70 to 4.60; 4 studies, n=1 070); and distal embolization was more likely at 30 days in thrombolysis participants compared to surgery participants (12.4% vs. 0%; OR 8.35, 95% CI 4.47 to 15.58; 3 studies, n=678). Participants treated by initial thrombolysis underwent a less severe degree of intervention (OR 5.37, 95% CI 3.99 to 7.22; 3 studies, n=1046).

Comment: The quality of evidence is downgraded by inconsistency (variability in results across studies).

Ədəbiyyat

  1. Berridge DC, Kessel DO, Robertson I. Surgery versus thrombolysis for initial management of acute limb ischaemia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;(6):CD002784.