The quality of evidence is downgraded by imprecise results (low number of events, wide confidence intervals) and by study quality (lack of blinding).
A Cochrane review included 4 studies with a total of 2 250 subjects comparing the effects of insulin detemir and insulin glargine in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
The mean difference in HbA1c level between insulin glargine and insulin detemir was not statistically significant: 0.08% (95% CI -0.10 to 0.27, p = 0.38). There was substantial statistical heterogeneity between studies (p = 0.01, I2 = 73%). Meta-analysis of change in HbA1c level resulted in mean difference of 0.07% (95% CI -0.10 to 0.24, p = 0.43). There was substantial statistical heterogeneity between studies (p = 0.04, I2 = 64%).
Insulin glargine was associated with significantly lower fasting glucose (mean difference of 0.34 mmol/L [95% CI 0.01 to 0.67, p = 0.043]), but not significant fasting glucose lowering than insulin detemir (with statistical heterogeneity [p = 0.11, I2 = 50%]).
The percentage of patients achieving good glycaemic control (HbA1c < 7%) was similar between the two insulins (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.81 to 1.14). There was no difference between the two insulins in the rate of overall, nocturnal or severe hypoglycaemia (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.90 to 1.11, 1.00; 95% CI 0.03 to 1.09 and 0.88; 95% CI 0.59 to 1.30 respectively).
The mean difference in daily basal insulin dose was a significant 0.26 U/kg (p = 0.00049; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.41), in favour of insulin glargine (statistical heterogeneity between studies: p < 0.00001, I2 = 94%). Detemir was associated with significantly less weight gain; mean difference -0.91kg (95% CI -1.21 to -0.61) and significantly more injection site reactions (RR 3.31; 95% CI 1.13 to 9.73) than glargine.
Date of latest search: