Əsas səhifə

Çap

Əks əlaqə

İnfo
Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis versus automated peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal disease

Mündəricat

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis versus automated peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal disease

Sübutlu məlumatların xülasələri
16.07.2017 • Sonuncu dəyişiklik 16.07.2017
Editors

There appears to be no difference between continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and automated peritoneal dialysis for clinically important outcomes in end-stage renal disease.

A Cochrane review included 3 studies with a total of 139 subjects. Automated peritoneal dialysis (ADP) did not differ from continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis with respect to mortality (RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.51 to 4.37), risk of peritonitis (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.11), switching from original PD modality to a different dialysis modality (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.02), hernias (RR 1.26, 95% interval 0.32 to 5.01), PD fluid leaks (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.11 to 9.83), PD catheter removal (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.48) or hospital admissions (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.43 to 2.17). There was no difference between either PD modality with respect to residual renal function (MD -0.17, 95% CI -1.66 to 1.32). One study found that peritonitis rates and hospitalisation were significantly less in patients on APD when results were expressed as episodes/patient-year. Another study found that patients on APD had significantly more time for work, family and social activities.

Comment: The quality of evidence is downgraded by imprecise results; limited study size for each comparison.

Ədəbiyyat

  1. Rabindranath KS, Adams J, Ali TZ, MacLeod AM, Vale L, Cody J, Wallace SA, Daly C. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis versus automated peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(2):CD006515.