Əsas səhifə

Çap

Əks əlaqə

İnfo
Combined intermittent pneumatic compression and pharmacological prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism

Mündəricat

Combined intermittent pneumatic compression and pharmacological prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism

Sübutlu məlumatların xülasələri
18.07.2017 • Sonuncu dəyişiklik 18.07.2017
Editors

Combined mechanical intermittent pneumatic leg compression and pharmacological prophylaxis appear to decrease the incidence of deep vein thrombosis when compared to compression, and incidence of pulmonary embolism when compared to anticoagulation.

A Cochrane review included 22 studies (15 RCTs and 7 controlled clinical trials) with a total of 9 137 subjects. The included studies evaluated orthopedic patients (n = 12), urology patients (n = 2), cardiothoracic patients (n = 1), neurosurgery patients (n = 1), trauma patients (n = 1) or general surgery, gynecology and other types of patients (n = 5). Most of the participants had a high-risk procedure or condition.

The incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was lower in the intermittent pneumatic leg compression (IPC) + pharmacological prophylaxis group compared with IPC only but there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE). The addition of an anticoagulant to IPC increased the risk of any bleeding and incidence of major bleeding compared to IPC alone (table ). No difference between the type of surgery subgroups such as orthopedic and non-orthopedic participants for DVT incidence were found. Tests for differences between type of surgery subgroups were not possible for PE incidence.

IPC plus pharmacological prophylaxis versus IPC alone
OutcomeRelative effect (95% CI)Assumed risk - IPCCorresponding risk - IPC + pharmacological prophylaxis (95% CI)Participants (studies)
IPC=intermittent pneumatic leg compression; PE=pulmonary embolism; DVT=deep vein thrombosis
Incidence of PEOR 0.49 (0.18 to 1.34)8 per 10004 per 1000 (1 to 10)3 017 (12 studies)
Incidence of DVTOR 0.52 (0.33 to 0.82)41 per 100022 per 1000 (14 to 34)2 934 (11 studies)
Incidence of bleedingOR 5.04 (2.36 to 10.77)7 per 100033 per 1000 (16 to 67)2 155 (7 studies)
Incidence of major bleedingOR 6.81 (1.99 to 23.28)1 per 10006 per 1000 (2 to 22)2 155 (7 studies)

Compared with pharmacological prophylaxis alone, the use of combined IPC and pharmacological prophylaxis modalities reduced the incidence of symptomatic PE (table ). There was no difference in the incidence of DVT. Increased bleeding side effects were not observed for IPC when it was added to anticoagulation. No difference was detected between the type of surgery subgroups for PE incidence or for DVT incidence.

IPC plus pharmacological prophylaxis versus pharmacological prophylaxis alone
OutcomeRelative effect (95% CI)Assumed risk - pharmacological prophylaxisCorresponding risk - IPC + pharmacological prophylaxis (95% CI)Participants (studies)
IPC=intermittent pneumatic leg compression; PE=pulmonary embolism; DVT=deep vein thrombosis
Incidence of PEOR 0.39 (0.23 to 0.64)29 per 100012 per 1000 (7 to 19)3 544 (10 studies)
Incidence of DVTOR 0.42 (0.18 to 1.03)62 per 100027 per 1000 (12 to 64)2 866 (11 studies)
Incidence of bleedingOR 0.8 (0.3 to 2.1481 per 100066 per 1000 (26 to 159)244 (3 studies)
Incidence of major bleedingOR 1.21 (0.35 to 4.18)41 per 100049 per 1000 (15 to 150)244 (3 studies)

Comment: The quality of evidence is downgraded by imprecise results (few outcome events).

Ədəbiyyat

  1. Kakkos SK, Caprini JA, Geroulakos G et al. Combined intermittent pneumatic leg compression and pharmacological prophylaxis for prevention of venous thromboembolism. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;(9):CD005258 .