The quality of evidence is downgraded by study limitations (unclear allocation concealment and blinding), and by imprecise results (few patients and outcome events).
A Cochrane review included 5 studies with a total of 605 subjects. Pooling was not done due to limited data and clinical heterogeneity between studies. Two studies compared negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) with standard moist wound dressings. The first of these was conducted in people with diabetes mellitus (DM) and post-amputation wounds and reported that significantly more people healed in the negative pressure wound therapy group compared with the moist dressing group (table ).
| Outcome | Participants (studies) | Assumed risk (moist dressings) | Corresponding risk (NPWT) | Relative effect (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proportion of wounds healed (mean follow-up 16 weeks) | 162 (1) | 388 per 1000 | 559 per 1000 (400 to 780) | RR 1.44 (1.03 to 2.01) |
| Amputation (mean follow-up 16 weeks) | 162 (1) | 106 per 1000 | 26 per 1000 (5 to 116) | RR 0.25 (0.05 to 1.10) |
The second study, conducted in people with debrided foot ulcers, also reported a statistically significant increase in the proportion of ulcers healed in the negative pressure wound therapy group compared with the moist dressing group (table ). Findings from the remaining 3 studies provided limited data, as they were small, with limited reporting.
| Outcome | Participants (studies) | Assumed risk (moist dressings) | Corresponding risk (NPWT) | Relative effect (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proportion of wounds healed (mean follow-up 16 weeks) | 341 (1) | 530 per 1000 | 790 per 1000 (588 to 1000) | RR 1.49 (1.11 to 2.01) |
| Amputation (mean follow-up 16 weeks) | 341 (1) | 101 per 1000 | 40 per 1000 (17 to 96) | RR 0.40 (0.17 to 0.95) |
Date of latest search: