A systematic review including 3 studies (one prospective, one retrospective, and one unknown) was abstracted in DARE. The gold standard was histology or (for negative test results) imaging and follow-up. All pheochromocytomas: The sensitivity ranged from 96% (specificity 85%) to 100% (specificity 100%) and the specificity from 85% (sensitivity 96%) to 100% (sensitivity 100%). The pooled positive LR was 7.86 (95% CI: 5.17, 11.94) and the pooled negative LR was 0.02 (95% CI 0.01, 0.04). Significant between-study heterogeneity was observed for the positive LRs (P=0.017). Sporadic pheochromocytomas. The sensitivity ranged from 97% (specificity 84%) to 100% (specificity 100%) and the specificity from 82% (sensitivity 99%) to 100% (sensitivity 100%). The pooled positive LR was 5.82 (95% CI: 4.81, 7.05) and the pooled negative LR ratio was 0.02 (95% CI 0.01, 0.07). No significant between-study heterogeneity was observed.
Comment: The quality of evidence is downgraded by sparse data and possibility of publication bias, and upgraded by strong association.