Əsas səhifə

Çap

Əks əlaqə

İnfo
Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy

Mündəricat

Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy

Sübutlu məlumatların xülasələri
05.09.2017 • Sonuncu dəyişiklik 05.09.2017
Editors

The no-scalpel method of vasectomy results in less bleeding, hematoma, infection, and pain as well as a shorter operation time than the traditional incision technique.

A Cochrane review included 2 studies with a total of 1529 subjects. The larger trial (n=1429) demonstrated less perioperative bleeding (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.89) and pain during surgery (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.93), scrotal pain (OR 0.63; 95% 0.50 to 0.80), and incisional infection (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.78) during follow up than the standard incisional group. Both studies found less hematoma with the no-scalpel technique (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.36). Operations using the no-scalpel approach were faster and had a quicker resumption of sexual activity. Neither trial found differences in vasectomy effectiveness between the two approaches to the vas.

Ədəbiyyat

  1. 8 March 2009]. LA, Pun A, Gallo MF et al. Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(3):CD004112.