Əsas səhifə

Çap

Əks əlaqə

İnfo
Manual versus powered toothbrushing for oral health

Mündəricat

Manual versus powered toothbrushing for oral health

Sübutlu məlumatların xülasələri
12.07.2017 • Sonuncu dəyişiklik 12.07.2017
Editors

Powered toothbrushes with a rotation oscillation action are more effective than manual toothbrushing in reducing plaque and gingivitis.

A Cochrane review (abstract , review ) included 51 studies with a total of 4624 participants. Brushes with a rotation oscillation action removed plaque and reduced gingivitis more effectively than manual brushes in the short term and reduced gingivitis scores in studies over 3 months. For plaque at 1 to 3 months the SMD was –0.50 (95% CI –0.70 to –0.31), for gingivitis SMD –0.43 (95% CI –0.60 to –0.25) representing an 11% difference on the Quigley Hein plaque index and a 6% reduction on the Löe and Silness gingival index. At over 3 months the SMD for plaque was –0.47 (95% CI –0.82 to 0.11) and for gingivitis was –0.21 (–0.31 to –0.12). There was heterogeneity between the trials for the short-term follow up. Sensitivity analyses revealed the results to be robust when selecting trials of high quality. There was no evidence of any publication bias.

Ədəbiyyat

  1. Yaacob M, Worthington HV, Deacon SA et al. Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(6):CD002281.