Əsas səhifə

Çap

Əks əlaqə

İnfo
Intravenous heparin or low-molecular weight heparin in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy

Mündəricat

Intravenous heparin or low-molecular weight heparin in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy

Sübutlu məlumatların xülasələri
03.07.2018 • Sonuncu dəyişiklik 03.07.2018
Editors

Low-molecular weight heparin, administered in hospital subcutaneously, as an adjunct to thrombolysis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction, appears to be more effective than placebo and at least as effective and safe as intravenous unfractionated heparin for reducing cardiovascular events.

A systematic review including 12 studies with a total of 26,831 subjects was abstracted in DARE. Enoxaparin was statistically superior to placebo regarding medium-term death, reinfarction and angina rate in 2 RCTs. It was also superior to UFH for in-hospital and medium-term occurrence of death, reinfarction and angina in 2 RCTs. Study results varied regarding IRA patency rates. One trial reported a higher incidence of intracranial haemorrhage, twice that obtained with UFH. One RCT found that dalteparin was superior to placebo on left ventricular thrombosis and arterial thromboembolism on day 9, with no effects on the reinfarction or mortality rates; however, dalteparin was associated with a higher risk of major and minor bleedings. A second RCT found no significant effect on Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow in the infarct related artery (IRA), but TIMI 0 to 3 flow and its combination with intraluminal thrombus were significantly less frequent in the dalteparin group; the rate of clinical events were also lower in the dalteparin group compared with placebo. Compared with UFH, dalteparin had no significant effect on clinical events and on the IRA late patency, but less thrombus.

A systematic review including 6 RCTs with a total of 1,735 subjects was abstracted in DARE . In all analyses, heparin led to non-significantly lower odds of death (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.39), corresponding to an absolute difference of 5 deaths/1000 treated. For t-PA only the OR was 0.84 (95% CI 0.43 to 1.64). For streptokinase/APSAC only the OR was 0.96 (95% CI 0.55 to 1.66). With aspirin the OR was 1.01, and without aspirin it was 0.72 (95% CI 0.36 to 1.45). The risk of bleeding of any severity was significantly higher (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.98).

Comment: The quality of evidence is downgraded limitations in review quality.

Ədəbiyyat

  1. Rubboli A, Ottani F, Capecchi A, Brancaleoni R, Galvani M, Swahn E. Low-molecular-weight heparins in conjunction with thrombolysis for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. A critical review of the literature. Cardiology 2007;107(2):132-9.
  2. Mahaffey KW, Granger CB, Collins R, O'Connor CM, Ohman EM, Bleich SD, Col JJ, Califf RM. Overview of randomized trials of intravenous heparin in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy. Am J Cardiol 1996 Mar 15;77(8):551-6.
  3. Antman EM, Louwerenburg HW, Baars HF, Wesdorp JC, Hamer B, Bassand JP, Bigonzi F, Pisapia G, Gibson CM, Heidbuchel H, Braunwald E, Van de Werf F. Enoxaparin as adjunctive antithrombin therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results of the ENTIRE-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 23 Trial. Circulation 2002 Apr 9;105(14):1642-9.